latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fiorina-taxes-20101021,0,1161240.story
HP benefited from state tax breaks while Fiorina was CEO
The U.S. Senate candidate says California has a business-hostile tax
structure that was a reason she outsourced thousands of jobs while head of
Hewlett-Packard. Yet during her reign the firm was one of 21 that got a state
sales tax refund even after having already offset some income tax bills.
By Scott Gold, Los Angeles Times
9:31 PM PDT, October 20, 2010
Carly Fiorina, who is staking her U.S. Senate campaign on her corporate
record, contends that California's tax structure is hostile to business — one
reason, she has said, that she was forced to outsource thousands of jobs when
she ran Hewlett-Packard Co.
But while Fiorina was chief executive of the
computer giant, the state was hospitable enough to grant the company a
controversial $13-million tax refund even though, state officials said, it had
already used credits to offset some income tax bills.
One of 21 firms
that collectively received more than $80 million in sales tax refunds, HP was
awarded $13 million in 2005, when the company posted net earnings of $2.5
billion. That year, California faced a $6-billion budget gap and slashed funding
for public health programs, education and law enforcement.
In asking for
the rebates, the companies cited provisions of a law that state officials said
were designed to encourage small start-ups to invest in manufacturing equipment.
Hewlett-Packard bills itself as the world's largest technology company.
A
state tax board — four of whose members had received political contributions
from companies including HP — agreed with the firms, overruling the advice of
its own staff.
Tax records are not public, but state finance authorities
said the companies sought the refunds after they had already "zeroed out" their
state income tax bills. That can be done in a variety of ways, but many
technology companies use research and development tax credits, among the more
generous business incentives offered in California, to erase their income tax
liability.
Taxpayer associations called the refunds unfair and labeled
them corporate welfare — "a giveaway of taxpayer dollars," said Lenny Goldberg,
executive director of the California Tax Reform Assn.
The tax credit "was
abused," said former state Sen. Carole Migden, a Democrat and former chairwoman
of the tax board. "California taxpayers were taken advantage of."
HP did
pay payroll, property and federal taxes in the years for which a portion of its
state taxes were excused, according to the finance authorities; and
supporters said the exemptions were fair and deserved, considering the economic
activity generated by such companies.
Fiorina spokeswoman Julie Soderlund
said in an e-mail that "HP followed the tax laws of the state of California and
California was, and continues to rank, at the bottom of states to do business in
for many reasons, including its tax and regulatory structure."
HP
officials declined to comment for this article.
In years before the vote,
Hewlett-Packard made $20,000 in political donations to the four members of the
five-member Board of Equalization who approved the tax relief, according to
campaign records filed with the state. The board acts as a jury of sorts in
state tax disputes.
Three of those members — then-chairman John Chiang,
who is now California's controller; then-Controller Steve Westly; and former
legislator Bill Leonard — said the donations had no bearing on their votes. The
fourth, Claude Parrish, could not be reached for comment. The fifth member,
Betty Yee, abstained from the vote and said this week that she had been
"disappointed" by her colleagues' decision.
Soderlund's statement did not
address questions about the donations.
Fiorina, 56, was named chief
executive of Hewlett-Packard in 1999, making her, by some measures, the
highest-ranking woman in the history of American business. The Board of
Directors fired her after six years. She is now the Republican nominee in
California for U.S. Senate, running against Democratic incumbent Barbara
Boxer.
Fiorina's record at HP, which shed more than 30,000 jobs, by some
estimates, while she led the company, has been a subject of debate in the
campaign. Fiorina has maintained that she created more jobs than she eliminated,
and she has blamed the company's outsourcing on California's business climate,
in particular its taxes and thicket of regulations.
On the day she
announced her candidacy last year, she said HP had "put jobs elsewhere in the
nation and elsewhere in the world. And it is a demonstration of the fact that
government policies can kill jobs. California today, as a state, is losing more
jobs every day than are being created here. And that is because of the tax
structure, the regulatory mandates that exist here."
HP, along with 20
other companies, had pressed the state to grant investment credits for equipment
purchases. The appeal was made under a tax credit designed to recover some of
the 250,000 manufacturing jobs that had been lost in California to the recession
of the early 1990s.
HP sought more than $13 million in credits for
purchases made in 1999 and 2000, Fiorina's first two years as CEO.
Some
lawmakers and other critics of the board's decision said the law was not
intended to provide the refunds to companies that had already used tax credits
to cancel out their corporate income taxes.
Former state Sen. John
Burton, chairman of the California Democratic Party, said the ruling "was an
absolutely bogus giveaway of the people's money. That was never anywhere close
to the intent of the legislation."
Chiang said in an interview that the
board was "following legislative intent." Westly said in a statement that the
decision was a "pro-jobs vote."
Leonard, a Republican who is now
secretary of the State and Consumer Services Agency, agreed.
"HP had
spent literally all of their profit on research and development and equipment —
buying machines that, technically, put them into a non-tax-owing conclusion," he
said. Without the additional tax refund, he said, "HP would have spent money on
manufacturing — but not in California."
Carl Guardino, president and
chief executive of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said the investment
credit was one of the "puzzle pieces" California used to try to improve the
business climate. HP is among the 325 companies that are members of Guardino's
association; the group was created 30 years ago by a Hewlett-Packard founder to
involve Silicon Valley executives in public policy.
Guardino said the
business climate in California is akin to being hit by a car and breaking 30
bones and that not only was the manufacturing investment credit good policy, it
was akin to fixing just one of those bones.
"The doctor set one bone — so
why aren't I fine?" he said. "California has the equivalent of 30 broken bones
when it comes to being competitive just with other states, much less other
nations."
Burton said it was a fallacy that California is hostile to
business.
"Companies open up here," he said. "People do business here.
People get very rich here."
scott.gold@latimes.com
Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times